AGENCY THROUGH HINDU SPIRITUALITY IN K.S. MANIAM’S THE RETURN

  • MOHAMMAD EWAN AWANG UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
  • NORITAH OMAR UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
Keywords: advaita vedanta, agency, hinduism, K.S. Maniam, The Return

Abstract

Hinduism plays an integral role in the Malaysian Indian identity construction. Its philosophical and spiritual tenets provide a crucial epistemic understanding of selfhood and existence to the Malaysian Indians for them to live a meaningful and flourishing life. Nonetheless, there is a perceived lack of discussion on the transformative role of Hinduism to the Malaysian Indians. The existing body of research predominantly views Hinduism as an outward representation of the Malaysian Indian identity through its religious festivals, rituals, and ceremonies. Hinduism is deemed to either exacerbate their sense of alienation and marginalization in Malaysia or reiterate the community’s nostalgic longing for Mother India. In this line of thought, religion is said to lack the capacity to grant agency to the Malaysian Indians. This article explores how these views are challenged by K.S. Maniam, a Malaysian Indian author who explores the transformative capacity of Hindu philosophy and spirituality to the Indian community in his literary works. Using Maniam’s first novel, The Return (1982), this article explores the transformative role of spirituality in bestowing the Malaysian Indians an alternative form of agency. Maniam’s narrative strategies reflect the Indian philosophy, Advaita Vedanta which stresses on the concept of “oneness†and the obliteration of the self-other and subject-object duality. Indian philosophy of space, time, reality and selfhood are woven into and embodied by one of the novel’s main characters, Periathai. Periathai attains the highest form of Hindu identity, Atman or True Self through spiritual knowledge, rituals, and self-reflexivity. This article suggests adherence to Hinduism provides the Malaysian Indians the agency to transcend the corporeal and physical realms, deconstruct the normative view of Hinduism as an ethnocentric religious nostalgia for India, and challenge the idea that religion further aggravates the Malaysian Indian sense of marginalization and displacement.

References

Arapura, J. (1989). Spirit and spiritual knowledge in the Upanishads. In E. Cousins (Ed.), Hindu spirituality. New York: Crossroads Publishing.
Ariffin, M. S. (2009). Ethnicity in post-independence Malaysia in Menteri and In a Far Country: A thematic study. English Language Journal, 3, 1-8.
Deutsch, E. (1969). Advaita Vedanta: A philosophical reconstruction. Honolulu: The University of Hawaii Press.
Gabriel, S. P. (2010). Un/settling Malaysia: Diaspora and national desire. In L., de Pretto, G., Macri & C., Wong, (Eds.), Diasporas: Revisiting and discovering. Oxford: Inter- Disciplinary Press.
Greet, A. (1991). An interview with K.S. Maniam at the Flinders University of South Australia. CRNLE Reviews Journal, 1, 1-11.
Hirschmann, N. (2003). The subject of liberty: Toward a feminist theory of freedom. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25(2), 115-39.
Holdrege, B. A. (2008). Body. In S., Mittal & G., Thursby (Eds.), Studying Hinduism: Key concepts and methods. New York: Routledge.
Kee, T. C. (1992). Just in so many words. Singapore: Heinemann Asia Lim
Kent, A. (2004). Divinity and diversity: A Hindu revitalisation movement in Malaysia. Singapore: ISEAS.
Lee, R., & Ackerman, S. (1997). Sacred tensions: Modernity and religious transformation in Malaysia. Columbia: University of South Caroline Press.
Lim, D. C. L. (2005). The infinite longing for home. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Madhok, S. (2013). Action, agency, coercion: Reformatting agency for oppressive contexts. In S., Madhok, A., Phillips, K., Wilson & C., Hemmings (Eds.), Gender, agency an coercion. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Maharaj, N. (2006). The ultimate medicine as prescribed by Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj: Dialogues with a realized master. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
Maniam, K. S. (1981). The Return. Kuala Lumpur: Skoob Pacifica.
Ng, A. H. S. (2011). Intimating the sacred: Religion in English language Malaysian fiction. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.
Pillai, S. (2004). Dislodging imperial crates of subalternity: A study of the Indian representations of the Indian coolie experience of colonial Malaysia. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
Quayum, M. A. (2007). Self-refashioning a plural society: Dialogism and syncretism in Malaysian post-colonial literature. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 9(2), 27-46.
Quayum, M. A. & Wicks, P. (Eds.). (2001). Malaysian literature in English: A critical reader. Petaling Jaya: Pearson Education Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
Radhakrishnan, S. (1977). Indian philosophy (Vol 2). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Rambachan, A. (2006). The Advaita worldview: God, world, and humanity. New York: State University of New York.
Sandhu, K. S. (1969). Indians in Malaya: Some aspects of their immigration and settlement patterns (1786 – 1957). London: Cambridge University Press.
Sinha, V. (2013). Mapping a field: Forms of Hindu religiosity in Malaysia and Singapore. Religion Compass, 7(4), 115-125.
Sugirtharajah, S. (1998). Picturing god. In. B., Paul (Ed.). Themes and issues in Hinduism. London: Wellington House.
Wicks, P. C. (2002). Diaspora and identity in the fiction of K.S. Maniam. The Atlantic Literary Review, 3(4), 115-127.
Willford, A.C. (2006). Cage of freedom: Tamil identity and the ethnic fetish in Malaysia. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Vidyaranya, P. (1954). A treatise on Advaita metaphysics. Madras: Sri Ramkrisha.
Published
2016-09-19